Tuesday, September 09, 2025

OPEC+ RETURNS TO ITS OLD WAYS

 El Taladro Azul

M. Juan Szabo [1] y Luis A. Pacheco [2]

Published  Originally in Spanish in  LA GRAN ALDEA

In other times, the market could count on OPEC to make decisions with some rationality, although it has deviated from that expectation from time to time. This week, the cartel and its partners, OPEC+, which in theory have been working to keep the oil market balanced, once again stirred the oil market by announcing they would add new production, precisely when other countries forecast production increases.


Most actors did not expect OPEC to change from its fundamental policy of ensuring market balance, better described as "price defense," to reconquering markets that have been lost or could be lost due to lack of action.


OPEC+'s flirtation with the possibility of dismantling the second tranche of its voluntary cuts, of 1.65 million barrels per day (1.65 MMbpd), significantly affected oil markets during the week. However, the OPEC+ communiqué after the meeting in Vienna this Sunday, September 7, turned out to be almost a symbolic decision, limiting the new opening to 137 thousand barrels per day (137 Mbpd) in October, and adjusting for overproduction by members since January 2024.


The market's reaction to this discreet announcement will be evident when markets open on Monday. As we mentioned last week, only a little more than half of the barrel volume announced by the cartel since April has materialized.


On the geopolitical side, meetings in China of leaders opposed to the U.S., projecting a new world order, were full of symbolism, challenges, and political positioning, seeking to project military innovation, cooperation, and new alliances. The U.S. was not far behind in seeking to project its strength within the current order, which revolves around the American economy, dollar primacy, and military power, particularly in the Western Hemisphere. Behind the scenes, China and the U.S. have problems to solve in their economies.


While these choreographies developed in China and the Americas, hot spots associated with long-running wars generated little effect on the oil market. Still, unfortunately, no agreements were reached that would lead to potential lights at the end of the tunnel, either in Ukraine or the Middle East conflict—many geopolitical theatrics with little probability of real agreements to support them.


FUNDAMENTALS

During recent weeks, the physical fundamentals of the oil market have not provided evidence that the insistent news and projections of substantial supply increases are materializing as announced. On the other hand, the expectation of demand contraction in response to discouraging economic results also does not seem to be reflected in the balances.


However, this insistent narrative has received weekly support from some event that contributes to undermining oil market confidence. This week, it was OPEC+'s turn to be the messenger of change again. Indeed, the media insistently reported that the organization was considering getting rid of another layer of voluntarily shut-in crude starting in October of this year.


After keeping the market on edge, the eight countries that form OPEC+ announced in a communiqué from Vienna on September 7 that they had agreed to adjust their production. The decision corresponds to a production increase of 137 thousand barrels per day starting from October 2025. These are part of the 1.65 million barrels per day that the group agreed to shut in April 2023.


Source: OPEC

This new adjustment looks discreet. The individual numbers are barely a fraction of the production they still haven't opened from previous announcements. Additionally, the communiqué clarifies that "They also confirmed (the eight countries) their intention to compensate for any overproduced volume since January 2024 fully." "The eight OPEC+ countries will maintain monthly meetings to review market conditions, compliance, and compensation."


This new cartel decision adds another layer of difficulty to tracking compliance with all these announcements, past and present. For now, the total volume of crude opened from April to October should be 2.34 MMbpd.


Strategy and Materialization of Announcements

This new position seems more like psychological warfare than commercial strategy. It seeks to dissuade competitors from implementing and/or accelerating their production plans for fear of a greater price drop.


The opening of incremental crude by OPEC+ has been slower than the supposedly shut-in crude levels suggested. Of the 2.2 MMbpd announced to be opened between April and September of this year, only 1.3 MMbpd have materialized (an increase of 300 Mbpd compared to July), and it has really been Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Iraq that have been the protagonists of that increase. In particular, the first two countries have pressured the rest of the group to approve the new strategy based on their need to recover market share.


Low oil prices and the prospect of additional drops tend to discourage investments for generating new production potential in regions with higher development and production costs, such as the U.S., Canada, and Argentina.


United States Economic Situation

The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) of the U.S. Department of Labor has published discouraging employment figures, indicating that non-farm payroll employment increased by only 22,000 jobs in August. Analysts had forecast that the economy would add 75,000 jobs during the month.

According to the agency, improvements in the health sector were offset by job losses in the federal government, mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction.


Meanwhile, July figures were revised upward, from 73,000 to 79,000, while June figures were revised downward by 27,000, going from 14,000 to -13,000. The unemployment rate rose slightly, from 4.2% to 4.3%. The August employment report was considerably weaker than expected. Let's remember that President Trump forced the departure of the previous head of this agency, disagreeing with the published figures.


The employment results and unemployment rate in the U.S. can have a dual interpretation. For now, the market, harassed by pessimism, interpreted them as a symptom of an economy headed toward recession due to confusion and confrontations caused by the imposition and negotiation of tariffs. On the other hand, these figures could also be the determining factor for the Federal Reserve (FED) to cut interest rates at its September 17 meeting and begin reducing interest rates. A reduction of 50 basis points at once (0.25%), or 25 points, three times during the rest of the year, is not ruled out.


National Oil Situation

The U.S. oil situation remains unchanged. Reducing drilling rig and fracking crew activity has offset technological well drilling and fracturing improvements. Thus, production remains at approximately 13.2 MMbpd, although the Energy Information Administration (EIA) estimates 13.4 MMbpd, using its calculation model with an adjustment factor.


Commercial crude inventories in the U.S. have increased by 2.4 MMbbls due to a 3 MMbbls increase in imported crude, while gasoline inventories fell by 3.8 MMbbls, with constant refining runs. Overall, the inventory report points to healthy demand.


We estimate that at Brent crude prices below $66/bbl, about 400 thousand barrels of marginal Canadian crude production could exit the market. Growth in Argentina's Vaca Muerta basin could be affected by up to 50%. Additionally, that price level would generate cuts in the investment budgets of smaller companies.


GEOPOLITICS

Although very active during this past week, geopolitics has remained in the background regarding its influence on the oil market. Apart from logistical complications generated by Ukrainian drones at Russian refineries and crude and petroleum product storage yards, the oil business was conducted independently of geopolitical complications.


War Between Russia and Ukraine

The continuation of the war between Russia and Ukraine - the Trump/Putin summit proved ineffective.

The Kremlin's current stance on the Ukraine war can be summarized as: "Yes, we want peace, but only on our terms. Do you reject our terms? Then there will be no peace." In this same vein, the agreement by 26 European Union states to provide security guarantees to Ukraine in the form of troops stationed in Ukraine to prevent another Russian attack, if a ceasefire in the war is achieved, was dismissed by Putin, with a warning to the West: "If troops appear there, especially now that fighting continues, we proceed from the basis that they will be legitimate targets for destruction." Regarding ending the war and achieving peace, it isn’t easy to see when and how two positions as different as those held by the parties will converge.


Shanghai Cooperation Organization Meeting

Chinese President Xi Jinping received 20 international leaders at the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) meeting. A victory parade was also held in Beijing. Both events were propaganda bets designed to undermine the current world order.


SCO welcomed some 20 international leaders amid negotiations with Donald Trump's administration over the trade war. But also in this meeting, those present at the summit attracted much attention, especially due to the presence of Indian leader Narendra Modi, who made a historic visit that relaxed relations with China just after New Delhi was hit by President Trump's tariff policy.


This event was followed by the celebration of Victory Day in Beijing, marking the 80th anniversary of China's victory over Japan in World War II. A victory that, paradoxically, was led by the nationalists, today reduced to inhabiting the Island of Taiwan. Despite the impressive military parade and sophisticated state-of-the-art weaponry, what attracted most attention was the platform where Xi Jinping and his guests, from 26 countries around the world, sat.


For the first time, Xi has appeared alongside Russian President Vladimir Putin, North Korean Kim Jong-un, and Iranian leader Masoud Pezeshkian. The four form what could be called the vanguard group of the opposition to American hegemony, accompanied by other leaders from 22 countries. Their common denominator is their aversion to the U.S. and the international system it represents.


All these displays of brotherhood, cooperation, and agreements to implement an economic and political order different from the current one are like an empty shell, as the attendees have divergent interests in almost all matters that drive world geopolitics. On one hand, neither China nor India is interested in the Ukrainian conflict. India and China are competitors due to the characteristics of their export-based economies. On the other hand, none of these countries, except a few, can afford not to participate, either as suppliers or consumers of the world's largest economy; the U.S. represents more than a quarter of the global GDP.


The only tangible result of all the Chinese fanfare was the eventual financing of the "Power of Siberia 2" gas pipeline, which could increase gas delivery from Russia to Asian countries. However, besides facing significant uncertainties, this announcement is a project that would materialize in the long term.


Situation in Israel and Gaza

Israel has decided to take Gaza City, eliminate what remains of Hamas, and weaken the Houthis, amid strong international rejection and increasingly widespread accusations of genocide. Israel encouraged residents to leave Gaza City toward the designated coastal zone of Khan Younis, in southern Gaza, assuring those there that they would be able to receive food, medical care, and shelter.


Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu says Gaza City is a Hamas stronghold and that capturing it is necessary to defeat the Palestinian Islamist militants, whose October 2023 attack on Israel triggered this war. Israeli military officials say they have killed many of Hamas's top leaders and thousands of its fighters, reducing the Palestinian militant group to a guerrilla force. Hamas has ruled Gaza for nearly two decades, but today controls only parts of the enclave.


The Gaza war has left Israel increasingly diplomatically isolated, with some of its closest allies condemning the campaign that has devastated the small territory. According to local authorities, that is, Hamas, some 64,000 Palestinians have died since the beginning of the Gaza war, and much of the enclave has been reduced to rubble, and its residents face a humanitarian crisis.


There are also growing calls within Israel, led by hostage families and their supporters, to end the war through a diplomatic agreement that guarantees the release of the remaining 48 captives, only 20 of whom are believed to be alive.

In any case, what remains curious is that this is perhaps the only Middle East conflict that has not impacted oil prices, as has been the case on several other occasions in the region's troubled history.

United States Military Exercises

The U.S. orchestrates military exercises with a naval and aerial deployment in the Caribbean Sea, Panama, and Mexico, a declared war on narco-terrorism, with French presence.


A significant U.S. military force is deployed in areas associated with maritime and terrestrial routes used by narco-guerrillas and their cartels. Venezuela's Soles cartel is considered by the Trump administration as the most dangerous narco-terrorism in the region, having at its disposal all the power of a state and qualifying it as a threat to U.S. security.


The French presence is no coincidence. There is concern that limiting drug access to the U.S. will activate what has been called the drug "highway 10," which is the route used through French Guiana using the 10th parallel to reach Africa, Cabo Verde, and some former French colonies like Mali, Burkina Faso, Niger, from where they reach Morocco, Algeria, and even Libya to supply the growing drug demand in Europe.


Syria Resumes Oil Exports

News of little specific weight regarding the relationship between geopolitics and the oil market, but with significance that confirms rapid changes in the Middle East, is the confirmation that Syria exported 600,000 barrels of heavy crude from the port of Tartus as part of an agreement with a trading company; this is the first known official export of Syrian oil in 14 years.


Syria exported 380 Mbpd of oil in 2010, a year before protests against Bashar al-Assad's regime became an almost 14-year war that devastated the country's economy and infrastructure, including crude production.


PRICE DYNAMICS

The mere expectation of an OPEC+ announcement injected anxiety into the oil market, which showed strength based on the market's physical fundamentals. The rumor that Saudi Arabia and the UAE would try to convince the remaining OPEC members and other associated countries to continue opening the production capacity of crude shut-in for two years moved the floor out from under prices.

Obviously, this process, if materialized, would affect the finances of major producers. Still, Saudi Arabia and the UAE are better prepared than others for that eventuality due to their sovereign funds and access to international financing. In fact, Aramco is preparing another bond placement to meet its investment budget and dividend payments to shareholders. Market sentiment weakened, and prices fell by more than 4% in the second part of the week.


Thus, at market close on Friday, September 5, the benchmark crudes, Brent and WTI, were trading at $65.5/bbl and $61.87/bbl, respectively, about 3% below the previous week's close.


VENEZUELA

INVASION, AN IMPROBABLE BUT EFFECTIVE SCENARIO

Venezuela's political situation continues deteriorating, driven by international accusations linking the government with drug trafficking and terrorism networks, particularly through the so-called Soles Cartel, and an inflationary and recessionary economy. Although it might seem obvious that this crossroads is reached through democratic erosion, concentration of all powers, questioned elections, and generalized repression, taking the country to levels not experienced in a long time, domestic discourse only seeks external culprits.


Escalation of Tensions

The deployment of U.S. naval and air forces has begun generating dangerous situations for the regime. A vessel manned by 11 people, supposedly carrying a drug shipment nominally valued at more than $100 million, is speculated to have departed from San Juan de Unare on the coasts of Sucre State bound for Trinidad and Tobago, but was destroyed by a U.S. attack during the journey, raising the temperature of confrontation between the two states and provoking international criticism for American use of lethal force.


Subsequently, 2 Venezuelan military aircraft flew over one of the U.S. military vessels, which was classified as a provocation. Following this event, President Trump authorized the renamed Department of War (formerly Department of Defense) to use force at the discretion of fleet commanders. Additionally, 10 F-35 aircraft were sent to Puerto Rico, minutes from the U.S. fleet. Nerves are frayed. In Venezuela, there is a deployment of military and militia with balaclavas at checkpoints, even in cities - a tense and dense atmosphere.


Economic and Exchange Policy

Meanwhile, economic policy has continued its course, oriented toward reducing the exchange gap between the official market and other markets. Apparently, this has had some success, selling foreign currency at a controlled price using the USDT market, which ends up being higher than the official market. The official exchange rate reached 155 Bs/$, and the new limited mechanism averaged 180 Bs./$, narrowing the exchange gap to 38%. Tax collection showed some improvement, giving some support to the government's finances.


Chevron Activity

Economic authorities anxiously await contributions from U.S. oil company Chevron's activity, which is moving less crude than expected for now. Royalties from payment in kind (oil) sold in the Chinese market could be about $80 million in September. Dollars that Chevron sells through domestic banks could reach about $35 million in September.

The volume of Venezuelan crude sent to the U.S. market was unusually low (70 Mbpd vs. 200 Mbpd). Based on the tanker movement chartered by Chevron, it could continue to be less than estimated. Deliveries in August and September could indicate that the new license (which is confidential) could limit crude placed in the U.S. market to Chevron's "equity crude." September's close will shed light on this possibility.


OIL OPERATIONS

The self-elevating drilling rig we mentioned last week passed under the bridge over Lake Maracaibo and continued its journey, supposedly toward the Lagunillas Lake block, where it will soon begin operations.


Crude Production

Crude production during the last week averaged eight hundred fifty-eight thousand barrels per day (858 Mbpd), geographically distributed as follows:

Area

Mbpd

Chevron

West

222

108

East

120

-

Orinoco Belt

516

118

TOTAL

858

226


Chevron's production has remained level since the company returned to operate in its joint ventures. The increase in Western production comes from the PetroZamora joint venture (not operated by Chevron).


Refining and Petrochemicals

National refineries processed 226 Mbpd of crude and intermediate products, with a gasoline yield of 74 Mbpd and diesel of 75 Mbpd. There have been no changes in the petrochemical sector, with active plants running at limited capacities due to natural gas availability.


Exports

Crude exports in August averaged 640 Mbpd in seventeen tankers: ten to the Far East, six to the U.S., and one to Cuba. As a proxy for shipments destined for China, Malaysia, and without a definitive destination, China received 550 Mbpd of crude; the U.S. received 70 Mbpd, and Cuba received 20 Mbpd. Exported crudes were 60 Mbpd of Boscán, 26 Mbpd of Hamaca, and 554 Mbpd of Merey-16. We estimate that the weighted price of exported crudes is in the order of $31.6/bbl.


CITGO Auction

In other news related to the national oil industry, a new offer in the auction of shares of CITGO's parent company, which is being held in Delaware courts, was announced this Friday. Blue Water Acquisition Corp, a special purpose vehicle, announced that it had submitted an offer valued at 10 billion dollars for the parent company of the Venezuelan-owned refinery, Citgo Petroleum. The offer includes a settlement proposal of 3.2 billion dollars for holders of the so-called PDVSA2020 bond, which remains in dispute in a New York court—a new act in this troubled drama.


In Colombia, Mónica de Greiff, recently appointed president of Ecopetrol's Board of Directors, categorically denied this week’s plans to import gas from Venezuela, despite the Colombian government's manifest interest in reviving that alternative. De Greiff also said that Ecopetrol was attempting to purchase Monómeros, the subsidiary of Venezuelan Pequiven that operates in Barranquilla. This is another developing farce.

Tuesday, September 02, 2025

THE DISCREPANCY BETWEEN PROJECTIONS AND DATA UNSETTLES THE MARKET

 El Taladro Azul

M. Juan Szabo [1] y Luis A. Pacheco [2]

Published  Originally in Spanish in  LA GRAN ALDEA

Photo: Amuay, Refinery, Venezuela. 1950's

The oil market presents divided opinions: on one hand, some consider that an oversupply could occur, and on the other, those who maintain that current fundamentals indicate the need for greater investments to maintain market balance. Additionally, the potential growth of renewable energies introduces factors that may justify revisions in global oil demand projections.

During the week, reports from some investment banks, joining the IEA's position, pushed markets downward. However, inventory data, production increases well below expectations, stubborn demand growth, and geopolitical factors maintained the price floor.

Oil prices headed toward a second consecutive week with minimal gains, as hopes for a negotiated solution to the Russia-Ukraine conflict faded, and trade tensions between the U.S. and India remain unresolved. Next week, on September 7, OPEC+ meets to evaluate current market conditions and its production cuts.

To date, OPEC+ announcements have been a double-edged sword. On one hand, they worry the market about the new volume that would theoretically enter the market. But on the other hand, the limited materialization of those barrels undermines the credibility of the announcements.


FUNDAMENTALS

Bank of America joined Goldman Sachs in predicting a substantial increase in oil production for the remainder of this year and 2026. Its market research department expresses this in its weekly report, resonating with the perspectives of the International Energy Agency (IEA).

The BearsThe pessimistic narrative orchestrated by the IEA’reports and some banks goes as follows: Crude production has increased in OPEC and its allies, known as OPEC+; as the group has accelerated production increases seeking to regain market share, supply prospects increase, which pressures global oil prices downward; this supply increase adds to material production growth in countries outside the OPEC+ sphere, creating an avalanche of production that would coincide with mediocre demand growth, as the peak gasoline consumption season in the U.S. is coming to an end. To this are added new changes in global tariffs that erode economic growth prospects.

Alternative vision

In this edition, we wanted to share an alternative vision:

Demand side

On the demand side, the numbers indicate that demand has maintained its growth rate of just over one hundred thousand barrels per day (100 Mbpd) per month, which would tend to be maintained once two events settle positively. On one hand, the Federal Reserve's (FED) probable decision to begin reducing interest rates in September, which would give a boost to economic activity in the U.S., and, on the other, the end of uncertainty related to the complex process of agreeing on tariffs between the U.S. and its trading partners. The most recent experience indicates that the matter will tend to converge to agreements that would not materially affect economic flows; however, ongoing negotiations with China could modify this premise.


Supply side

On the supply side, we have adjusted the projection of production increase in each country to the latest official announcements made by competent authorities or companies responsible for implementing the growth of OPEC+, the U.S., Canada, Brazil, Guyana, and Argentina, offset by production decline in the rest of the world. This data is reflected in the graph below, where increases by country can be observed for the next 11 months and cumulative incremental production in the same period.


It is important to note that, in the case of the U.S., we are respecting the increases forecast by the Energy Information Agency (EIA) of around 300 Mbpd. However, today, the materialization of that increase looks unlikely.

The second graph compares net supply increases with the demand increase we estimate during this same period. It can be observed that, except for what remains of 2025, due to the coincidence of OPEC+ increase with increases in Brazil and Guyana, incremental supply growth will exceed the increase in demand. But from January 2026 and the rest of the year, according to our calculations, demand increases will be superior to supply increases.



Country-by-country analysis

Examining expected production increases in the countries mentioned above allows us to identify some particularities.

OPEC+

OPEC+ announced that 2.2 MMbpd will flow to the market by the end of September from all voluntarily shut production. However, in the first days of September, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Iraq appear to struggle to implement an opening of about 1.0 MMbpd. The effort to achieve what was announced looks even more titanic in light of low drilling activity.

United States

For its part, hydrocarbon activity shows stagnation in the U.S. The main indicators, active rigs and the number of DUC wells (drilled and uncompleted wells), indicate a slowdown in activity. On the other hand, commercial crude and gasoline inventories, according to the EIA, show declines of 2.4 and 1.3 million barrels, respectively. This picture casts doubt on the possibility of increasing production until the end of 2026.

Argentina

In Argentina, hydrocarbon production continues to reach historic figures. In July, production reached 811.2 Mbpd, a value not achieved since 1999; while in natural gas, production reached 2000 levels, 5.7 million cubic feet per day (MMcfd).

Guyana

The steepest production growth slope, since 2019, corresponds to Guyana. This small country, through ultra-deep water oil activities carried out by a powerful consortium led by ExxonMobil, has already put into operation four large floating production units (FPSO), which will allow it to reach production of more than nine hundred thousand barrels per day (900 Mbpd) by the end of the first quarter of 2026.

While these countries, including Canada, are growing in production, the rest of the world, afflicted by a lack of investment and poor exploratory results, is declining at around 2% annually.


GEOPOLITICS

In geopolitical scenarios, the energy market remains alert for a possible military escalation in any existing conflicts or the deepening of economic sanctions, which can disrupt global supply.

Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Some of these escalations are already happening. Ukrainian attacks on Russian refineries have eliminated more than 15% of Russia's refining capacity, equivalent to more than one million barrels per day (1 MMbpd), and have caused fuel shortages in some Russian regions and Crimea. A similar effect, but on Russian oil exports, has been caused by damage from Ukrainian drones to the Unecha pumping station, limiting the loading capacity of the Baltic port of Ust-Luga to three hundred fifty thousand barrels per day (350 Mbpd), that is, half of the usual production capacity. Both events are affecting Moscow's ability to finance its war machine.

Proposals for direct negotiations between Presidents Zelensky, Putin, and Trump have fallen on deaf ears in the Kremlin. President Putin's intransigence is giving President Trump reasons to harden his stance on the Ukraine conflict. The escalation of Russian attacks on population centers, which even reached a European Union headquarters, enraged European leaders, who now want to impose their own secondary sanctions on buyers of Russian products.

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer accused Russian President Vladimir Putin of "sabotaging hopes for peace." At the same time, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said that "Russia showed its true face" with the latest attacks. Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni noted that Russia's attack demonstrates that it is not interested in negotiating an end to the war in Ukraine. Finally, according to the Pentagon, the U.S. State Department has approved the sale of air-launched cruise missiles and related equipment valued at an estimated $825 million.

Sanctions on India

On the other hand, economic sanctions imposed by the U.S. on India for purchasing Russian crude went into effect on Wednesday and have caused unrest in India, not only because of the commercial significance of the sanctions, but also because they consider it discriminatory for not applying similar sanctions to China.

Middle East

In the Middle East, while negotiations are apparently underway for the release of all hostages held in Gaza and the end of the almost two-year war, Israel recovered the body of another murdered hostage. Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich has published an infographic showing how Hamas is intended to be defeated by the end of 2025.

The minister described the necessary steps to isolate Hamas and overthrow the military capabilities of the remaining terrorist organizations. In four words: "we isolate Hamas from its weapons, its money, its people, and its territory. That's how we will win." Hamas has harshly criticized these statements. In the bombing of the Gaza Strip, on Friday night, Abu Obeidah was eliminated, the well-known highest-ranking leader in Gaza and one of the ISIS leaders, Muhammad Abd al-Aziz Abu Zubaida.

In another typical Mossad and IDF operation event, an airstrike on Yemen was reported, called "Operation A Little Luck," which was launched after precise intelligence information about the leading group of Houthi rebels. Indeed, in the attack, Houthi Prime Minister Ahmed Al-Rahawi was killed, along with other members of the terrorist regime's leadership.


PRICE DYNAMICS

The market has not seen the materialization of announced crude supply increases, leading those most concerned about overproduction to think that supply and demand may be in a more precarious balance. Similarly, demand erosion has not materialized for now; there seems to be a tendency toward the "status quo."

Oil prices rose at the beginning of the week due to Ukrainian attacks on Russian oil export terminals and news of reductions in American inventories. However, the mere mention of conversations among Ukraine's European allies about a possible ceasefire kept price increases in check. On Friday, prices gave up part of the week's gains in response to noise from India regarding imposed tariffs.

Thus, at the close of markets on Friday, August 29, the benchmark crudes, Brent and WTI, were trading at $67.48/bbl and $64.01/bbl, respectively, almost identical to the previous week's close.


VENEZUELA

The circle closes

In today's Venezuela, moments are being lived that could be described as a mixture of cold war, hot war, and economic war as a consequence of pressure imposed by the U.S. This is a more critical situation for the White House than it appears at first glance. The outcome of this stand-off is crucial for Venezuela's future, and it could affect Trump's immigration policies, regional relations, and even the results of midterm elections in the U.S.; ultimately, it would impact crude prices and the hemisphere's long-term energy security.

Main geopolitical elements

The main elements that define this geopolitical moment are:

  • Amid this tension, the American oil company, Chevron, has resumed its operations in Venezuela thanks to a special license granted by the U.S. Venezuelan crude continues flowing toward the Gulf Coast of America, which may or may not be paradoxical depending on the outcome.
  • The U.S. government is clearly reviewing the status of the Maduro administration. It does not recognize him as head of state. It accuses the highest-ranking leaders of the ruling party of leading the Cartel of the Suns, an organization linked to drug trafficking and now classified as a terrorist group by the Treasury Department. This cartel is attributed to links with FARC, ELN, the Aragua Train, and the Sinaloa Cartel. By virtue of this new classification, the U.S. has offered a $50 million reward for information leading to Maduro's capture.
  • Trump has ordered the most significant military deployment in the Caribbean in decades, with seven warships, an attack submarine, and more than 4,500 troops and marines. Although officially it is an anti-drug operation, several advisors and observers interpret that it has nuances that include the pursuit of cartel members.
  • Venezuela has responded with naval patrols, drone displays, and the deployment of 15,000 soldiers on the border with Colombia. Diplomatic tension has escalated, with Caracas denouncing "imperial harassment" to the UN and activating its Bolivarian Militia. Meanwhile, the Venezuelan population lives between hope for change for the better and fear of military intervention.

Economic situation

The economy continues out of control. Income from oil activities resulting from Chevron's return still does not provide enough resources to shore up an economy in free fall. Neither is the level of monetization resulting under the terms of the new license known, that is, the amount of foreign currency entering the exchange system. Authorities have accelerated the sliding of the bolívar's official exchange rate, reaching close to 150 Bs./$. Dollar injection was limited, reserving part of the available dollars to offer them through controlled auctions at prices above the official rate. It was the only mechanism to stop the exchange market gap. For now, the gap remains between 40% and 50%. No one dares to publish projections of the inflation this exchange crisis generates.


Oil operations

A jack-up drilling rig is being towed in Lake Maracaibo, presumably for the Chinese company Concord. It is the first international marine drilling rig to enter operations in Venezuelan waters in many years. One or two cantilever-type drilling barges are also being rebuilt, supposedly for dual workover/recompletion (Wo/Rc) and drilling service.

Crude production during the last week averaged eight hundred fifty-five thousand barrels per day (855 Mbpd), geographically distributed as follows:

Area Mbpd (Chevron)

• West 219 (108)

• East 120

• Orinoco Belt 516 (118)

• TOTAL 855 (226)

Chevron's production has remained level since the company returned to operating in the Joint Ventures (JV).

National refineries processed 230 MBPD of crude and intermediate products, with a yield in terms of gasoline of 78 MBPD and diesel of 81 MBPD.

There have been no changes in the petrochemical sector, with active plants running at capacities limited by natural gas availability.

Crude exports in August are averaging about 552 MBPD. Thirteen tankers have been dispatched, 7 to the Far East and 6 to the U.S., for a total of 15.8 MMBBLS. The weighted price of exported crude is at $32.3/BBL.


CITGO

According to Reuters, in the auction organized by the Federal Court of Delaware, United States, for the shares of CITGO's parent company, Venezuela's creditors, Gold Reserve, Siemens Energy, Andean Consortium, and Global Securities presented motions to annul the offer made by Amber Energy. In early August, the "Special Master," Robert Pincus, had postulated that the offer made by Amber Energy, a hedge fund Elliott Investment Management subsidiary, was the "strongest" received so far.

In parallel, Canadian mining company Gold Reserve reported that its subsidiary, Dalinar Energy, presented an improved offer this Thursday. It should be remembered that Judge Stark had given Dalinar Energy additional time to prepare a counteroffer. Gold Reserve stated that its subsidiary "has substantially increased the proposed purchase price, has secured additional financial support, and has increased the certainty of its offer in non-economic ways."

Judge Leonard Stark is expected to make a final decision in September on the winning offer for the shares of the Venezuelan company, which other actors will likely challenge.


References:

¹ International Analyst
² Nonresident Fellow Baker Institute

Tuesday, August 26, 2025

A MARKET MARKED BY UNCERTAINTY


 Photo: Caripito Refinery, 1940. Source: https://retroboomerang.blogspot.com/2010/11/caripito-estado-monagas.html

The hope sown by the Russian-American summit in Alaska and President Trump's subsequent meetings with European leaders was soon frustrated by the realities of the battlefield and the confirmation that Vladimir Putin is unwilling to make concessions in his conflict with Ukraine. Financial markets had one of the least turbulent weeks of the year, with crude oil prices reacting discretely upward following the publication of inventory indicators and real demand and supply balances.

However, on Friday, which lately has become a day of surprises, capital markets changed their mood. The Dow Jones, S&P 500, and Nasdaq all surged nearly 2%, serving as support for the oil market, which remained positive for the week despite the dollar's strength, which usually pushes prices downward.


This relative optimism was due to Jerome Powell, the Federal Reserve Chairman, appearing to have granted the possibility of an interest rate cut. "It may be appropriate to adjust our monetary stance," he said in his anticipated speech at the Jackson Hole meeting.

As we approach the final quarter of 2025, energy industry leaders face a very complex scenario: low investment levels that don't seem able to recover to pre-pandemic levels; geopolitical tensions that are not resolved but rather transformed; new technologies and an energy matrix in metamorphosis; and imprecise and contradictory projections. In the Fundamentals and Geopolitics sections, we will shed light on some of these complexities and imprecisions.


FUNDAMENTALS

Given the political and economic weight of energy, and particularly oil, it is natural that two visions of the international oil market exist. After all, the market is determined by demand and supply, producers and consumers. Conflicting geopolitical positions also influence different interests, leading to other perspectives, at least for the next two years.


The Two Market Visions

Imminent Overproduction Scenario

  • It is based on significant production growth from OPEC+ countries and countries outside that framework, such as Canada, Guyana, Brazil, and, supposedly, the U.S.
  • On the other hand, a demand contraction is projected due to the effects of the trade war and lack of monetary stimulus for fear of inflation.

Demand Resilience Scenario

  • It is based on a scenario of demand resilience, especially in India, China, and South Korea.
  • It projects a deceleration in supply growth due to chronic underinvestment since 2019, to which would be added a potential escalation of geopolitical tensions threatening oil supply.

The first vision has been promoted by observers and analysts who, for lack of a better characterization, we'll call those with an "environmentalist tendency" or anti-fossil, whose most active spokesperson is the International Energy Agency (IEA). For some years, the agency has promoted divestment from fossil energy and its accelerated replacement with alternative energy sources. Naturally, the second vision is promoted by those who, while accepting climate change, postulate that discarding fossils is premature. OPEC, and since his election, the Trump administration, are the most important promoters of this vision.


Our Analysis

Within the volatile character of the oil market and its prices, our analysis aligns with the second vision, as we do not foresee changes in year-over-year demand growth, which has moved in recent years in a range of 1.0 to 1.3 million barrels per day. Additionally, we have not identified sufficient net additions to supply, including OPEC+ and non-OPEC+, to balance this demand increase.


The limiting factor on the supply side is the low levels of investment in the "upstream" sector of the oil value chain. This not only limits the growth rate in basins expected to increase production but is also insufficient to compensate for the decline in many regions. This is reflected, for example, in the under-fulfillment of production opening announcements in specific OPEC+ countries.


Our analysis on both the demand and supply sides does not deviate much from the forecasts published by the OPEC secretariat, whose projections many consider biased in favor of oil's permanence over time; undoubtedly a strategy consistent with its nature and objectives.


Obviously, with so many uncertainty-generating elements, scenarios may end up converging as a product of the global oil industry’s feedback mechanisms. After all, that's what the market is about.


Market Forces

The best example is the transformation in the development of North American "shale oil," which went from a stance of unbridled growth to a policy of financial moderation and priority remuneration of investors, putting a ceiling on its production, for now. The reduction of activities in Vaca Muerta, Argentina, in reaction to prevailing crude prices in recent months is less relevant, but in the same direction.


Some of our analyses regarding demand/supply balances are directly linked to regional details of oil fundamentals, which we will analyze below.


United States

The U.S., the world's largest oil producer, and with growing participation in the natural gas market, has had a cautious development with no apparent changes in the near future. The stability in its crude production, around 13.3 million barrels per day, results from slightly declining drilling activity and consumption of the decreasing inventory of so-called DUC wells (drilled but not completed). This buffer would be necessary to be able to react to unforeseen changes.

The total number of DUC wells is 5,280, the lowest level since the influence of "shale oil" was established in world markets. With declining drilling activity, it is almost impossible to avoid consuming the DUC well inventory, and it becomes more complex to change from a maintenance scheme to one of sustained growth.


OPEC+

OPEC+, the market's heaviest actor, with almost 40% of global production, continues with a double discourse, announcing reopenings of production that they had voluntarily closed to balance the market. They announced that they would open 2.2 million barrels per day (2.2 MMbpd), effective in September. However, by mid-August, they have only managed to increase about eight hundred thousand barrels per day (800 Mbpd); the only increases verified by OPEC secondary sources belong to Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Russia. The veracity of what Russia reports has always been difficult to corroborate.


Russia

What we know about Russia is that on August 15, surprisingly, Putin reversed his nationalizing decree of the extensive Sakhalin development, inviting Exxon to resume its participation under certain conditions. What is relevant about this decision is that it confirms that the Russian oil industry does not have the capacity to grow without Western financial and technological participation.


Kazakhstan

Kazakhstan's case also deserves review. The country's authorities have pushed for an international arbitration against major oil companies, such as Shell, ExxonMobil, and TotalEnergies, following the development of the Kashagan oil field. The government claims more than $150 billion in damages. It also alleges corruption and problems with production-sharing agreements, such as excessive cost deductions. It has also imposed a fine of $5.1 billion for environmental violations related to sulfur contamination from the Kashagan field.


The oil companies have had some success in local court rulings on the sulfur dispute, evidencing that environmental issues were only a spearhead to open negotiations on income and resource management in Kazakhstan.

The outcome of this arbitration process could affect all companies operating in the country. In a broader context, the dispute is part of a global change in which resource-rich nations seek more favorable contracts and higher income from large energy corporations—a story we have seen repeated in other latitudes.


Inventories and Monetary Policy

In its weekly report, the Energy Information Administration (EIA) showed a drop in U.S. commercial crude inventories of 6 million barrels and 2.7 million barrels of gasoline, the latter of which was related to unscheduled refinery shutdowns. In any case, the downward trend in crude inventories suggests healthy demand, despite indications of a slight increase in the unemployment rate. But this could change starting in September, if there is an increase in rates.


Indeed, the annual meetings organized by the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City took place in Jackson Hole, where economists, financial market participants, academics, and central bankers discuss, for three days, relevant financial policy issues and global events.


The Federal Reserve (FED) Chairman has traditionally used this meeting to give indications about monetary policy, and this time was no exception. Jerome Powell telegraphed that the restrictive policy maintained until now could change to a moderate stimulus. That is, he has officially opened the door to lowering interest rates for the next meeting on September 17, given persistent signs of cooling in the labor market and the GDP slowdown; a position that other FED officials had already taken. Powell declared that: "Inflation risks are biased upward, and employment risks downward: a complex situation, the FED will proceed with caution, but the changing balance of risks could justify an adjustment to our policy stance." Stock markets reacted to the message by rebounding between 1.6 and 1.9%, and oil prices consolidated their weekly strengthening.


Major Consumers

China

Meanwhile, on the major consumers' side, China's economic situation in August 2025 is one of sustained but uneven growth, with an annual GDP expected to be around 5% and a recovery driven by domestic consumption and industry. However, the economy faces significant challenges, including deflationary pressures, an intensified trade war with the U.S. affecting exports, a deceleration in fixed asset investment, and fragility in private domestic demand. In any case, growth in oil purchases of about 180 MBPD is anticipated during 2025.


India

India's case is slightly different. India is the world's fastest-growing economy, surpassing Japan as the fourth-largest, with a projected growth of 6.2% for 2025. This growth and the decline in national oil production will increase foreign crude purchases by more than 230 MBPD in 2025.


The Power of North American Natural Gas

Based on its character as a transition fuel and the boom in the Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) market for geopolitical reasons, North American natural gas could become the most coveted raw material in the coming years. Henry Hub gas prices remain 70% below the global gas benchmark price and oil in terms of energy equivalent. This discount, inherited from the difficulty of transporting gas between continents or long distances, should have been reduced by technological advances in this area, but strangely has been maintained since the Obama presidency for political, logistical, and resource reasons. But conditions have changed, and the time of discounts has ended. If we are correct, natural gas prices in the U.S. could double, making North American gas a highly profitable bet.


GEOPOLITICS

The change in international tensions on which markets had placed their hopes did not materialize. The war between Russia and Ukraine entered an irrational state, if there is rationality in war. President Putin gave no concessions at the Alaska meeting beyond his initial position, despite being under intense economic pressure from the fall in his hydrocarbon income and President Trump's threats of additional sanctions if progress toward a ceasefire was not achieved.


Russia-Ukraine Conflict

But Trump, in a decision that departs from his initial discourse, decided not to impose the promised sanctions, despite a new Russian attack on Ukraine, the strongest since the beginning of the war. In the Russian advance in eastern Ukraine, bloody confrontations occurred, but they did not end with additional territory capture for Russia. On the contrary, if one analyzes Russian control of Ukrainian territory since the beginning of the invasion, the Russian advance has been successfully repelled by Ukraine. Although Trump's position toward Ukraine and Europe seems to have shifted, at least in terms of tone of discussion, as long as he remains reluctant to impose sanctions, the discourse has no significant importance.


The only oil effects of this war's confusing and undefined situation are the temporary suspension, for the second time, of Russian oil supplies to Hungary and Slovakia and the reduction of Russian refining capacity by 13%.


Middle East

In the Middle East, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Thursday that Israel will immediately resume negotiations for the release of all hostages held in Gaza and the end of the nearly two-year war, but on terms acceptable to Israel, this was Netanyahu's first response to a temporary ceasefire proposal presented by Egypt and Qatar, which Hamas accepted on Monday. According to an Israeli official, Israel will send negotiators to the talks once the location is determined.


In conversations with soldiers near Israel's border with Gaza, Netanyahu said he was still determined to approve plans to defeat Hamas and capture Gaza City, the most densely populated center in the heart of Palestinian territory. Thousands of Palestinians have abandoned their homes as Israeli tanks approached Gaza City during the past 10 days, aggravating the humanitarian crisis of hundreds of thousands of Palestinians.


Israel's plan to take Gaza City was approved this month by the security cabinet, which Netanyahu chairs, although many of Israel's closest allies have urged the government to reconsider it. In the short term, these activities have a very low impact on the oil market.


Iran Sanctions

What can affect Iranian crude transit is OFAC's (U.S. Treasury Department) decision to further obstruct Iranian oil exports by imposing sanctions on Greek citizen Antonios Margaritis, his network of companies, and nearly a dozen vessels involved in the Iranian dark fleet. Several other ships and operators are also being designated for their role in facilitating Iranian oil exports, which generate income that contributes to Iran's advanced weapons programs and its terrorist tentacles.


Changes in International Banking

On the other hand, the enthusiasm of the world's largest banks for "Net Zero" emissions initiatives has faded quickly and quietly. Major financiers have backtracked, diluting or abandoning the application of ESG (Environment, Social, and Governance) guidelines.


Goldman Sachs announced, a month after Trump's electoral victory, that it would abandon the Net Zero Banking Alliance (NZBA), convened in 2021 by the financial initiative of the United Nations Environment Programme. Just months later, JP Morgan, Citi, Bank of America, Morgan Stanley, and Wells Fargo sealed their exit from the NZBA. Royal Bank of Canada, Bank of Montreal, and Toronto-Dominion followed the same steps. The domino effect has extended to London, where HSBC and Barclays left the group last month. These changes should facilitate increased investment in necessary oil and gas projects.


PRICE DYNAMICS

On Friday, crude oil futures remained around two-week highs. Benchmark indices appeared to consolidate weekly gains of around 3% in response to the drop in U.S. oil inventories. Much of the price volatility has been due to daily updates on negotiations between Ukraine and Russia, which have oscillated between pessimism and optimism, and their impact on oil's future balance.

Thus, at Friday's market close on August 22, the benchmark crudes, Brent and WTI, were trading at $67.73/bbl and $63.66/bbl, respectively.


VENEZUELA

A Tense Environment

This last week was particularly complex from any point of view, both geopolitical and economic. In fact, in Caracas, where people have learned to remain silent, there was talk of news filling the media. Some are true, others are rumors, speculation, or simple psychological warfare.

For example, the first two tankers with Venezuelan crude, under the new Chevron license, have already unloaded their cargoes in Port Arthur and New Orleans. At the same time, several tankers are arriving at Venezuelan ports, and another group is en route to our coasts.

In any case, the amounts of foreign currency that could reach Venezuela in the second half of September due to this new license could not mitigate this week's exchange crisis. The insufficient dollars pursued by a large quantity of bolívars forced the regime to try a mechanism of foreign currency offering above the value in the official market, as the only way to limit the runaway gap in alternative markets.


Exchange Crisis

The bolívar continued depreciating, exceeding 140 Bs./$ in the official market, with a gap against the parallel market approaching 50%. The Central Bank of Venezuela team is experimenting with ad hoc measures, hoping that Chevron's dollars can rebalance the accounts. Inflation figures have not been published, but the exchange market points to very high values.


Military Tensions

On the other hand, it is reported that a considerable U.S. military force will be positioned north of Venezuelan territorial waters by this Sunday. The declared objective of the military deployment is to prevent drug trafficking by cartels and gangs declared as narcoterrorists.


Reactions to this movement were swift. The UN urged parties to resolve their conflicts peacefully. China, Russia, and Iran advocated for non-foreign intervention, while Brazil and Colombia used the concept of Latin American integrity. However, President Petro had his give-and-take with the Venezuelan regime around the presence of Colombian guerrillas in Venezuela.


Chinese Investment

With great fanfare, details of the first Chinese private investment in the Venezuelan oil business appeared in various sources. Three months ago, this business was mentioned in the context of production participation contracts (CPP) that PDVSA had signed with a dozen companies to fill the void left by the cancellation of OFAC licenses.


It involves China Concord Resources Corp (CCRC), a company registered in Hong Kong with unknown shareholders but supposedly from the UAE. The company has no experience in oil production. Still, it is not new to PDVSA, as it is one of the intermediaries and owners of some tankers of the so-called "ghost fleet," which transports sanctioned crude to China's private refineries.

Under the protection of the Anti-Blockade Law, the company signed CPP contracts to operate two blocks in Lake Maracaibo: the Lake Five block and a block called Lagunillas Lake. The operator's remuneration will be in oil, which it can sell internationally. According to CCRC, the objective is to develop 500 wells and increase production to 60,000 bpd by the end of 2026. This involves the production of light and heavy crude. The light oil would be delivered to PDVSA, and the heavier crude would be exported to China. An initial analysis of the numbers indicates that this is yet another projection that cannot be fulfilled.


Miraflores Meeting

Finally, the week culminated with Maduro's call to the "Living Forces" to attend a meeting at the Miraflores Palace. The expectation was for economic announcements to try to control the pernicious effects of the lack of foreign currency. However, the meeting only resulted in a nationalist harangue, calling all forces to unite against the common enemy.


OIL OPERATIONS

Oil activities developed normally, except on Friday, when a major blackout, apparently caused by inclement weather, affected the center and west of the country.


Crude Production

Crude production during the last week averaged eight hundred fifty-one thousand barrels per day (851 Mbpd), distributed geographically as follows:

  • West: 215 Mbpd (Chevron: 108 Mbpd)
  • East: 120 Mbpd
  • Orinoco Belt: 516 Mbpd (Chevron: 118 Mbpd)
  • TOTAL: 851 Mbpd (Chevron: 226 Mbpd)

Chevron's production is almost at the same level as it was at the beginning of the year. Still, from the total produced (226 Mbpd), approximately 30% will be deducted for royalty payments in kind, leaving 158 Mbpd to be improved and diluted for sale to Chevron. How the income is distributed, apart from royalties, is a well-kept secret.


Refining and Petrochemicals

National refineries processed 220 Mbpd of crude and intermediate products, with a gasoline yield of 74 Mbpd and a diesel yield of 78 Mbpd.


In the petrochemical sector, methanol plants continue operating at 82% of their capacity, limited by gas availability. Fertinitro maintained both trains operating. The SuperOctanos plant has not been able to start due to natural gas limitations in the Jose complex. A propane shipment was sent from Jose to Tablazo to start the Olefins plant.


Exports

Crude exports in August are averaging about 552 Mbpd, and eight tankers have been dispatched: 6 to the Far East and two to the U.S. for 11.6 MMbbls. Our calculations indicate that about 4 MMbbls of crude destined for the U.S. in August could be dispatched, equivalent to about 135 Mbpd.

The weighted price of exported crude is at $32.2/BBL.


[1]: International Analyst

[2]: Nonresident Fellow Baker Institute

 

 

OPEC+ RETURNS TO ITS OLD WAYS

  El Taladro Azul M. Juan Szabo [1] y Luis A. Pacheco [2] Published  Originally in Spanish in    LA GRAN ALDEA In other times, the market co...